Hudson v. Michigan Blog Update

A month ago I wrote a post entitled Where is the Hudson v. Michigan Blog – A Suggestion for Law Students. Here are some subsequent developments, which demonstrate three benefits of blogging: further blogospheric conversations, helpful comments from readers, and interaction with those involved in the actual case:

    

1. Several blogs discussed my idea further, including: 

• Corrections Sentencing: Case Blogging 
• Human Law: Where is the Hudson v. Michigan Blog? 
• Judging Crimes: Where Indeed? 
• Transnational Law Blog: Now is the Time for Law Students to Become Pioneers in the Legal Blogosphere 

    

2. One commenter to the original post added this thread from SCOTUSBlog to my two examples of blogs discussing Hudson v. Michigan.

    

3. David A. Moran, an attorney who argued the case of Hudson v. Michigan before the Supreme Court, commented to my post. He pointed out that he had written an article on Hudson for the Cato Supreme Court Review, which is an overview of the previous Supreme Court term that comes out once a year. The article is entitled “The End of the Exclusionary Rule, Among Other Things: The Roberts Court Takes on the Fourth Amendment.” Mr. Moran was kind enough to send me a preliminary version of his article, and I highly recommend it. The 2006 Review can be purchased here.