United States v. Wilson (Feb. 2, 2005)

“…see also United States v. Jose Huerta-Rodriguez; 355 F. Supp. 2d 1019, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1398, No. 8:04CR365 (D. Neb. Feb. 1, 2005), available at http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/files/judge_
bataillon_huerta_ruling.pdf. (last visited Feb. 2, 2005).”

United States v. Wilson, 355 F. Supp. 2d 1269, 1271 (D. Utah 2005)

“Unless a district court is clear about how it arrived at a sentence - "showing its work" as one respected commentator colorfully put it n106 - that data collection process will be aborted.

n106 http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2005/01/
always_remember.html.”

Wilson, 355 F. Supp. 2d at 1286 (D. Utah 2005)   

    

Return to the main Cases Citing Legal Blogs page.