Would Publius Be a Spammer?
The Virginia Supreme Court has struck down the state’s anti-spam law for violating the First Amendment because it bars anonymous transmission of political, religious and other speech protected by the First Amendment and fails to limit its restrictions to fraudulent or commercial e-mail or to unprotected speech such as defamation or obscenity. [Text of opinion] Writing for the court, Justice G. Steven Agee observed, "were the Federalist Papers just being published today via e-mail, that transmission by 'Publius' would violate the statute" because it bars anonymous transmissions. [JH]
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Would Publius Be a Spammer?:
Tracked on Sep 21, 2009 2:45:11 PM
Tracked on Dec 24, 2009 12:06:39 PM
Tracked on Dec 27, 2009 5:35:43 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.